Showing posts with label economics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label economics. Show all posts

19 January 2009

Shai Agassi Goes Down Under

Better Place founder Shai Agassi has announced that Australia will become the third country to implement the group's vision of electric vehicles powered by renewable energy, following Denmark and Israel.
Shai Agassi, an entrepreneur and programming expert, founded a series of technology companies in Israel in the 1990s. Today Agassi is CEO of Better Place. Previously, he was President of the Products and Technology Group (PTG) at SAP AG.
Better Place, with commitments in Israel and Denmark and a partnership with Renault-Nissan to build electric cars with exchangeable batteries, has begun an ambitious venture to deploy a smart network of recharging spots, including battery exchange stations and charging spots at businesses and homes. Better Place is hoping to begin full scale deployment of its system in Israel in 2011, with Denmark following three to six months later and Australia a year after that.

Better Place will use its scalable model, which Israel and Denmark have adopted, to build an EV (electric vehicle) network in Australia. According to their model you’ll be able to recharge your EV battery overnight in your garage or your parking lot and/or exchange batteries at stations, which resemble car washes, spread around every 40 kilometres or so, faster than filling up your petrol tank today.
Under the Better Place model, consumers can either buy or lease an electric car from the French automaker Renault or Japanese companies like Nissan and then buy kilometres on their electric car batteries from Better Place. Better Place plans to own and operate the batteries and power generation (via AGL Energy , in Australia's case), and to sell kilometres travelled to drivers on a subscription basis, in similar fashion to the mobile phone industry, rather like one might buy a cell phone from the manufacturer (eg nokia or apple) and then air time from a supplier (orange or selkom). With that the Better Place network is intended to support all kinds of electric vehicles, including plug-in hybrids as well as cars that operate with exchangeable batteries.
Better Place in Australia plans to start by setting up charging stations in the Melbourne, Brisbane and Sydney, and then connect them with "electric highways," with stations set up every 40 kilometres.
“As the world’s sixth largest country, our network build out in Australia will demonstrate that the Better Place model works in all countries, regardless of size,” said Shai Agassi. Australia has the world’s seventh highest per capita rate of car ownership, with nearly 15 million cars on the road after adding something like a million new cars in a regular year.
Better Place and Macquarie Capital Group will raise $1 billion to build a network of 250,000 charging stations and battery exchange stations in key locations along the east coast by 2012. Wind turbines owned by AGL Energy will power the network. AGL Group General Manager Jeff Dimery said AGL will provide all of the renewable energy needed to power the EVs, while this initiative will accelerate the shift toward renewables that’s already underway. “AGL is committed to increasing its renewable energy generation and believes it is important to collaborate and implement cross industry initiatives to counter climate change. Because EVs charge primarily at night, they can maximize the potential of intermittent renewable energy such as wind.”
If it works the Better Place model will go a long way to helping Australia move towards oil independence. Agassi claims that oil is the sole major commodity that Australia still needs to import. Therefore the model has not only ecological implications but also political implications, possibly freeing Australia from energy dependence on regimes, whose interests do not always coincide with those countries that have developed economies.


Read More......

2008 IACC Trade Awards

Last month the IACC hosted their 2008 Trade Awards Reception. That includes trade with New Zealand and New Guinea as well. Around 150 guests filled the auditorium to applaud as honours were granted to an impressive array of businesses, traversing several industry groupings, covering the range of bilateral trade between Israel Australia and greater Oceania.
It could hardly be an IACC function if we didn’t heartily feast at another impressively catered spread of tables. But before the ingestion and networking we were updated on the trade scene by the guests of honour, from Fouad Ben-Eliezer (no intro needed) to James Larsen (Australian ambassador) and Gurion Meltzer (chairman IACC).
Did you know that in 1949-50 Australia exported $319,442 worth of mainly food items while imports from Israel were valued at just $32,490?

I learned that the main groupings of Australian Israeli bilateral trade are in water technology, agriculture hi tech and security. Some of the industries represented exporting from Israel are health care, plastics, agro technology, desalination, tools and components for the mining industry, defence, aviation stone and marble and diamonds. On the incoming side we import things like Australian kosher meat, education, gas, coal, wine, pharmaceuticals and cooling towers.
Today total trade between Australia and Israel stands at approximately 400 Million $US. Exports from Israel came to 270 Million $US, and export from Australia totalled approximately 127 Million $US.
But what I want to know is why?
Some of the considerations at play if you’re interested in bilateral trade between Australia and Israel are:
Australia is an attractive business location for Israeli companies, or so they say. But it’s so far away. It takes 2 ½ days to fly out there. But take heart, it’s only 1½ to get back. It’s all in the time zones.
Australia boasts a stable political system and high growth/low inflation economy and that it’s the third largest economy in Asia. A bit of continental shift there. That makes it a nucleus in the fastest growing region in the world. Geographical proximity to Asia and the shared time zones, make Australia an ideal base for opportunities in the Asia Pacific Region. Another advantage is that the cost of establishing a business in Australia is relatively low. Construction, commercial rental and other establishment costs and salaries for professional, management and skilled staff are competitive. (sorry if that sounds like a bit of double talk . I plagiarised that sentence) As we already know Australia offers a quality of life that is considered one of the best in the world, i.e. for Israeli businessmen looking to spend more quality time with customers down under. It also has a respected and established Jewish community, a variety of Jewish day schools.
In dealing with Australia, Israelis have to learn to understand Australian Mean Time. Israelis want things done right now when they want something done. They are used to thinking and acting within short time cycles and naively expect everybody else to adopt the same tempo. In Australia time is a much more relaxed affair. Australians like most other non-Israelis, prefer to take life a little easier – more “laid back” –last call isn't til 22:00 and tomorrow is another day.
But if Israeli businessmen can adapt to the time warp or is it wean themselves, they find Australians are informal, generally polite and importantly, reliable in interpreting contracts.
As we all ready know Israelis are direct. They tend to say what they are thinking (like on line) and aren’t shy about asking what they want to know. If you have the patience of a Freudian psychotherapist you won't necessarily perceive this straightforward attitude as rudeness. They may not have the polish of cultivated Western “manners” – but mean well (in their way).
Israelis are a casual people, a bit like Australians. They do not stand on ceremony and show an unparalleled level of offering a “helping hand”, hopefully not too coercively. They may well warmly invite you into their homes. On the other hand, they can occasionally be hot-tempered. Hopefully you won't have been exposed to a domestic altercation and/or it’s another brief storm with little substance, and everyone will get over it quickly.
On the upside Israelis often have quick decision-making abilities, willingness to take relatively high risks, well developed networking skills and flexibility. The word “Impossible” simply doesn’t exist in Israeli terminology. The Israeli never gives up. They have a great talent for improvisation, and will often help you find surprising solutions to problems. They are willing to work incredibly long hours (when working over seas). Therefore you will find they are available to you even after their official working hours and are happy to adapt themselves to the working hours of other countries.

So there you are if you’re not yet on a plane surfing the time zones. If you’re still here you can learn more if you’re on the IACC mailing list.

Read More......

28 June 2008

The Gulf Club

A new Middle East common market is emerging despite only scattered economic modernisation. With the price of oil blasting off and another Asian powerhouse emerging, The Diplomat Analytical Unit gives us the good oil from - an Australian perspective.
But before we get into that, are you aware that in December 2007 the GCC (Gulf Cooperation Council), which includes Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Bahrain, Oman, Kuwait, and the United Arab Emirates, decided to proceed to a full common market on Jan. 1, 2008? Founded in 1981 the GCC has been a loose security and economic grouping, but the new agreement will make it a far more important and cohesive body. The total economic output (or gross domestic product) of the GCC states this year will be around $800 billion, which makes them an economy close to the size of India in dollar terms.
The Gulf Co-operation Council states, whose wealth is largely based on oil, say the move will give them a stronger negotiating position internationally. It means the right of all GCC citizens to live and work anywhere in the GCC, to buy and sell real estate and make other investments, to move freely between the countries, and receive education and health benefits.
International trade is also likely to get a boost, as it will be easier to trade with the GCC because there will be only one entry point for trading. The GCC is also likely to see a major increase in foreign direct investment. The effects of Opening up the services industry to competition could also be 'enormous,' especially in the banking and financial sectors. Another key aspect of the common market will be its impact on labour movements, which if effective will achieve a better skill mix, which will result in increased productivity at lower costs. It will also mean their citizens can move freely between the countries for employment and education.


The Gulf Club
The soaring price of oil has put Gulf states into the position of dealing with vast surplus wealth that, at the very least, require considerable skills of modernism to manage. It is one of the great transfers of wealth in modern history.
According to investment bank Goldman Sachs, consumers from the developed world are handing over about $US1.8 trillion a year to oil producers, about twice the US current account deficit. This is only likely to accelerate.
The oil price, which has already risen fivefold from its 2003 level, is continuing to climb, possibly heading towards $US200 a barrel. In the 1990s, it fell as low as $US9 a barrel. Little surprise that foreign assets have reached $US1.8 trillion, more than 1 per cent of global capital stock.
Having experienced severe cyclical shifts over the last four decades, the challenge facing the states of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) is to invest the money in a way that will create sustainable economic growth. It will not be easy.
The greatest challenge is probably financial. Countries in the region have immature capital markets. The bond and stock markets are small, and there is a heavy reliance on bank debt. The Gulf states’ currency pegs to the US dollar, which are fixed on the capital account, are also tacit recognition of how immature their financial systems are.
In this sense, the Gulf states resemble another emerging powerhouse, China, which also fixes its currency to the greenback. In other respects, however, the challenge facing the region is the opposite. China is in a furious race to industrialise to raise the standard of living of its vast rural population; its political stability depends on being successful. By contrast, the Gulf states have comparatively small and wealthy populations. They are attempting to move to a post-industrial world in which they can manage their wealth for sustainable advantage.
The difficulty is to manage social dislocation as much as economic change. The Gulf states have, in effect, skipped the industrial era within their own countries because they were supplying the energy for the industrialisation of most of the rest of the world. They moved from a pre-industrial economic structure to a partial post-industrial structure.
The challenge now is to fill in the inevitable gaps. One is to diversify away from their extreme dependence on oil. Robert Newton, chief executive of the Australia Arab Chamber of Commerce, says hydrocarbons remain a “very strong” element in their economies. “Six economies represent half of OPEC’s reserves,” he says. “If they can unify their policies they can be even more effective in their impact on the global economy. Thirty-five million in population is not huge but the buying power there is massive.”
Newton says the level of reserves differs between countries. In the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Dubai is not well endowed with oil but is actively moving into other areas, especially construction. It is the location of a quarter of the world’s cranes and is adding population at the rate of 800 people a day, the fastest growth rate in the world. UAE non-oil exports were 47 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP) in 2007. The hope is to raise this to 70 per cent GDP by 2010.
Kuwait has 10 per cent global crude reserves and is one of the big oil economies alongside Libya, Iran, Iraq and Saudi Arabia. Newton says “there is a push to diversify the economic base – moving from refining, petrochemical to agriculture, fishing, tourism, mining”.
In Saudi Arabia, Newton says there have been “huge strides to industrialise, modernise and reform”. But perhaps of all countries in the region, the shift to post-industrial economic structures is clashing most with pre-industrial social habits. “Reform is assessed as a destabilising factor in society,” Newton says. “It is the custodian of the highest Muslim shrines, and that has a bearing on the government to take a cautious approach to modernising issues. There is a need to avoid going too fast in some areas.” Saudi Arabia is selectively secularising education. It is diversifying into heavy industry capacity, manufacturing of fabricated metal products, jewellery and gold, and foodstuffs. “There are all sorts of opportunities for companies in IT and security, in logistics or utilities,” Newton says.
There are also signs of liberalisation in the non-oil mining sector. Andrew Thomson, Chairman of Gulf & Asian Mining Ltd, says Saudi Arabia has changed its laws to allow foreign investment in mining. Before, only state monopolies were allowed. He says Australian-listed company Citadel Resources Group is now operating in the country. “It’s not easy to operate in Saudi Arabia. You don’t need a Saudi partner, you can have 100 per cent ownership, and it has a very modern regulatory environment. But it is very tough environmentally – it is so hot, more than 50 degrees, that they have to work drilling rigs at night.”
The greatest imperative for Gulf states is to modernise their financial systems, without which they will have to continue to send their savings offshore, contributing to global imbalances. Several commentators have drawn an analogy with the 1970s excesses. Instead of the petrodollars going to doubtful Latin American governments, they are going to doubtful sub-prime mortgages in America. But the destabilising effects have been similar.
Soaring inflation is just one indication of the financial stress that is being created in countries that lack developed financial markets. For example, according to a recent poll, 42 per cent of expatriates who have gone to the UAE in search of a better living are not saving, 17 per cent are going into debt and 28 per cent have sent their families out of the country because of rent increases. Just as a massive inflow of money is transforming these countries, so the ability to manage funds effectively will determine the sustainability of their living standards.
A further measure of the patchy nature of economic modernisation is the surprisingly high levels of unemployment. In Saudi Arabia, unemployment is estimated at 9-12 per cent. The construction industry almost exclusively employs less expensive foreign labour.
Australia has 350 companies operating in the UAE and 17,000 nationals, but the business links are immature. Thomson says the “retail funds industry is not well developed, which is a good opportunity for Australian financial services”. However there are no Australian securities brokers in the region; everything is done out of London. He says during summer there are many UAE visitors to Australia. “They feel very comfortable (here), but for business, it’s early days.”
Australia has proven a useful base for global companies looking to penetrate the Middle Eastern market. Kristian Aquilina, export manager for Holden Australia reckons that over the last three years Holden has sold around 30,000 cars annually to the Middle East. Sales are likely to dip this year, however, because of our strong currency. “We will probably miss out on the current oil boom because of the strength of the Australian dollar.”



Read More......

6 May 2008

Filling Up Your Tank

How much does petrol cost these days? US$120 per barrel? Maybe more all ready. Here are some tricks to get more of your money's worth for every litre filling up your petrol tank (from some guy who works on a South African pipeline.)
Only buy or fill up your car in the early morning when the ground temperature is still cold.
Remember that all service stations have their storage tanks buried below ground. The colder the ground the more dense the fuel, when it gets warmer petrol expands, so buying in the afternoon or in the evening....your litre is not exactly a litre.. In the petroleum business, the specific gravity and the temperature of the petrol, diesel and jet fuel, ethanol and other petroleum products play an important role. A 1-degree rise in temperature is a big deal for this business. But the service stations do not have temperature compensation at the pumps. When you're filling up do not squeeze the trigger of the nozzle to a fast mode. If you look you will see that the trigger has three 3 stages: low, middle, and high.
In slow mode you should be pumping on low speed, thereby minimizing the vapours that are created while you are pumping. All hoses at the pump have a vapour return. If you are pumping on the fast rate, some of the liquid that goes to your tank becomes vapour. Those vapours are being sucked up and back into the underground storage tank so you're getting less worth for your money.
One of the most important tips is to fill up when your tank is HALF FULL. The reason for this is, the more fuel you have in your tank the less air occupying its empty space. Petrol evaporates faster than you can imagine.
Petroleum storage tanks have an internal floating roof. This roof serves as zero clearance between the petrol and the atmosphere, so it minimizes the evaporation. Unlike service stations, here where I work, every truck that we load is temperature compensated so that every litre is actually the exact amount.
Another reminder, if there is a fuel truck pumping into the storage tanks when you stop to buy, DO NOT fill up--most likely the petrol/diesel is being stirred up as the fuel is being delivered, and you might pick up some of the dirt that normally settles on the bottom.
Hope this will help you get the most value for your money.

Read More......

16 September 2007

Not Living Off The Sheep's Back

On my all too rare visits to Australia over the last 20 or so years I’m often left wondering how is all this “lifestyle” bankrolled?
Back in the 80s Australia was on a long, slow slide in the national wealth rankings. There was primary industry but hardly any manufacturing industry to speak of. Back then one would conjecture what really made us any different from Argentina and Lee Kuan Yew even forecasted that Australia would become “the poor white trash of Asia”. Is Australia’s revived affluence just good luck and high iron ore prices?
Peter Hartcher the international editor of the Sydney Morning Herald and contributor to The Diplomat, writes in his article Global 100 National Champions: - Australia fully joined one of the metatrends of our era – globalisation – just in time… As we approach the 20th anniversary of the first wave of the Hawke-Keating tariff cuts, implemented in 1988, it’s now clear the Australian initiative occurred just as the world entered a phase of energised integration without precedent.

No economist myself, I’ve taken the liberty of summarising Hartcher’s article, basically by cut and paste. You can of course
read the whole piece in its entirety. A decade later, (after the Hawke Keating government started implementing Liberal Party economic policy- M.F.) communism collapsed in the Soviet Union and in 1992, India’s then finance minister and now Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh, began to bring socialist India into the global market economy. Of course in 1978 Deng Xiaoping had moved China into its post-ideological phase and began China’s transformation into a market economy. With these three momentous political acts, the world economy was set to become a global economy for the first time since the half-century before World War I.
If not for the entry of those three great blocs, the number of people in the world market would have been about two billion. Instead, it stands at six billion today and a great transformation is under way.
Australia did not want to join this global movement. With the exception of Australia’s miners and farmers, already competitive in the wider world, no Australian industry wanted to be pushed from the domestic nursery into the hard world of global grown-ups.
Nevertheless,Australia, the reluctant globaliser, has become one of the success stories of the international economy, held up by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development as a “model economy” for others to emulate.
Australia’s per capita income has risen in the world, ranking from 15th at the nadir of its performance in the 1980s to eighth today.
In the last decade unemployment has halved; the country’s unemployment rate is its lowest in 30 years. Net household wealth has doubled. Real wealth has increased by much more in the last 15 years than in the previous 30.
Remember Australia the farm and quarry? That picture, pretty accurate in 1950 when primary products accounted for 90 per cent of national exports, is now gratifyingly out of date.
Manufacturing, which had feared for its survival as Australia’s markets were opened, has adapted well despite serious competition from China, India and other Asian countries.
By 2004, exports of manufactures and services had surged to make up 45 per cent of the national export base. Better yet, two-thirds of Australia’s manufactures exports are not simple hunks of metal but are so-called elaborately transformed manufactures, higher value-added products like scientific and medical equipment and mechanical and electrical equipment.
As tariffs on manufactures have fallen from an average of 15 per cent in 1988 to 3.5 per cent today, the volume of Australia’s manufacturing output has grown by some 40 per cent and exports have multiplied by 500 per cent.
The reinvigoration of Australian manufacturing happened just in time – it coincided with a great boom in world manufacturing trade, which burgeoned by an astonishing twenty-fold expansion in the two decades to 2000. Something similar is now under way in the growth of global services trade.
And it’s not all just about waving goodbye as the freighter leaves the dock. Corporate Australia’s 4,012 foreign affiliates were selling $142 billion worth of goods and services directly into foreign markets in 2002-03, according to an Australian Bureau of Statistics estimate.
This means that Australian-invested subsidiaries, branches and majority-owned joint ventures abroad were selling 96 per cent as much directly into offshore markets as Australia was selling in conventionally-measured goods and services exports.
So the real value of corporate Australia’s total offshore sales is about double the traditional measure of exports.
Australia’s performance is not just a commodities boom based on a voracious China. Apart from the fact that the commodities boom has kicked in for only the last four years, the extra increment of mining output in 2005, for instance, contributed only 0.1 per cent to Australia’s annual economic growth of 2.7 per cent in that year.
The commodities boom is a tailwind helping Australia’s economy along, but it is, in the scheme of things, a modest bonus and not the basis for the national trajectory.
All in all, says Keating, “Australians have gained more from globalisation than it has taken from us.” Yet even Paul Keating could not do all this single-handedly. The government can only set the framework – it does not create the products, find the markets, make the sales, and create the wealth. That task falls to Australia’s private sector. The political leaders can wear the cocked hats and set the course, but it is companies that pull the oars of national economic progress.
Which Australian companies have prospered in this globalising marketplace?
There are some predictable answers, there are also many surprises in a survey of Australia’s champions of the new, globalised world economy. We see that the long competitive experience and natural endowment of the Australian mining sector translates into highly internationalised mining giants – BHP-Billiton, Rio Tinto, Woodside. No surprise there.
Likewise, from the rump that was once Australian manufacturing we now see competitive manufacturers like Ansell, Cochlear, CSL, Mayne Pharma, Orica, Rinker and Amcor, all of which make at least half their money outside Australia.
In a global economy where demand for services is exploding, there are some healthy signs of life in Australian services firms like Sonic Healthcare, ABC Learning and Flight Centre, all of which generate a quarter or more of their revenues abroad. And there are some standout success stories – Westfield, CSL, Billabong – demonstrate that it is impossible for traditional industry policy approaches to “pick winners”. Which industry bureaucrat in Canberra would have put shopping centres or surfwear or serums on the list of Australia’s international commercial priorities?

Read More......

22 June 2007

IACC Chamber Membership Invitation

WELCOME (Paul Israel from IACC sent this in.)
Welcome to the Chamber's 2007 Membership Invitation.
The objective of this invitation is to share with you the Chamber's activities over the past twelve months and encourage you to renew your membership or join for the first time.
In the past year, the Chamber has hosted three major delegations from Australia which totalled 70 different participants (The Property Mission led by Michael Rothner, MD-Ashe Morgan Winthrop, The High-Tech Delegation led by Australia's Minister for Communications& IT-Senator Helen Coonan and The Monash University Mission led by its President Prof. Richard Larkins). On top of this, the IACC handled in some way or another, over 140 trade-related enquiries, dealt with close to 100 visitors and assisted 70 Israeli business-people visit Australia.
In addition, an outbound Mission organised in conjunction with the Israel Export Institute had Mr Binyamin 'Fuad' Ben-Eliezer MK, Minister for National Infrastructures lead a Delegation To Australia focusing on Water.
The coming months will see the Chamber host the Inaugural Melbourne Manhigim Mission, a health Delegation from Western Australia and later in the year a large Mission is expected to attend the Water Conference/Exhibition which coincides with the 90th Anniversary of the Battle of Be'er-Sheba fought and won by the ANZACs. Plus we're expecting an array of other visits, planned events and activities.
As you can appreciate, the IACC is a private, non profit, non-Government organisation dedicated to the promotion of bi-lateral trade and relations. Funding is provided through the IACC's Functions, Trade Missions, Sponsors and most importantly our members.
The Chamber is fortunate to work closely with it's six Sister Chambers in Australia and NZ (Sydney, Melbourne, Adelaide, Perth, Brisbane and Auckland-NZ.) Today the IACC represents one of Australia's strongest networking organisations.


For more information please contact: Paul Israel, Executive Director Israel-Australia, N.Z. & Oceania Chamber of Commerce
Phone: +972-3-510-6464

Mobile +972-54-442-3385

Email: anztrade@netvision.net.il

Fax: +972-3-516-8931

http://www.aicc.org.au/

Postal Address: POB 50473 Tel-Aviv 61500, ISRAEL

Location: Level 11, 29 Hamered St, (Industry House) Tel-Aviv

( P.S. Paul sent me an impressive PowerPoint presentation with photographs and further details, which I couldn't post due to technical hitches. I presume he'd be happy to forward it any of you who'd be interested to see it. I would be too.
I think the IACC constitutes a great spirit of non passivity for long term Israeli Australians to grab hold of and embrace. I think their collaborative, affirmative and assertive approach in an often hostile environment, is the stuff to give meaning to our immigration to Israel, considering the non refugee nature of Australians’ immigration to Israel.- M.F.)


Read More......

18 February 2007

International Social Security Agreements

Australia currently has 18 bilateral international social security agreements. Israel is not included in that list.
As of August 2005 there were 51,442 Centrelink customers residing overseas permanently who were receiving the Australian Age Pension. The majority of these customers (79%) reside in European countries. A further 8,409 customers were receiving the Disability Support Pension, 792 customers were receiving Widow B Pension and 1,627 customers were receiving Wife Pension.

There is no uniformity to Australia’s bilateral international social security agreements and different benefits are covered depending on the countries involved.
The Southern Cross Group, an advocacy group for expat Australians, claims that these bilateral social security agreements make it easier for Australians who live overseas and contribute to the social security system in their host country, to claim benefits, in particular age pension benefits, in either Australia or the host country later on.
Here is a list of the sort of benefits that Australian pensioners can be getting contributions for, from separate governments, if covered by one of these international agreements:
• retirement;
• disability;
• widowhood; or
• survivorship.
It also includes:
• payments to a partner or carer; and company pensions and superannuation payments that are regulated through a country's national social security system.
Maybe you’ve been living in Israel since your 20’s or maybe you’ve retired here, so whether you’d be basically eligible for Australian social security is an individual issue. Either way the key words in the Australian social security system are residence and financial circumstances.
The Australian government sees bilateral social security agreements as based on the concept of shared responsibility. Partner countries under each agreement make concessions against their social security qualification rules so that people covered by the agreement may access payments for which they might otherwise fail to qualify. According to The FaCSIA*site these agreements are bilateral treaties which close gaps in social security coverage for people who migrate between countries. They do this by overcoming barriers to pension payment in the domestic legislation, such as requirements on:
• citizenship
• minimum contributions record
• past residence record
• current country of residence
There is a fundamental difference between the Australian income support system and the contributory systems found in other developed countries. The rate of social security benefits paid in Australia depends on need (assessed through income and assets tests) and not on the length of contribution. Australia's income support system is residence based and is funded from general revenue. Generally, social security payments are only available to Australian residents who, when assessed against means tests, qualify for income support. There are minimum residence requirements for some payments. But its possible that if there was a bilateral agreement between Israel and Australia, mutually recognising rights accrued in the partner country, and if you’d spent a couple of decades in Australia sometime in your life, that you’d be considered an eligible Australian resident and entitled to some form of Australian social security. Try working it out from the FaCSIA site.
'Portability' refers to the continuation of Australian income support payments during a recipient's overseas absence. Portability policy acknowledges that travel is an integral part of modern living. The bilateral agreements extend the eligibility conditions for people who are unable to receive pensions from either Australia or the agreement countries because they cannot meet the minimum residence requirements or contribution conditions. Under these agreements, Australia equates social insurance periods/residence in those countries with periods of Australian residence in order to meet the minimum qualifying periods for Australian pensions. The other countries generally count periods of Australian working life residence as periods of social insurance in order to meet their minimum qualifying periods for payment. Also, some countries will only pay their pensions overseas into countries where there is an agreement that provides for this. Usually, each country will pay a part pension to a person who has lived in both countries.
As of July 2005, 351,000 Australian age pensioners were also receiving a foreign pension; out of those 46,424 resided outside Australia. From the Australian government point of view A Comparable Foreign Payment (CFP) is any payment from a foreign country that is paid periodically to an Australian pensioner to provide income. The FaCSIA claims that in an overwhelming number of cases, the combination of the Australian pension and the CFP increases the person's overall level of disposable income. This constitutes a 'win-win' situation for Australian pensioners and taxpayers alike.
The FaCSIA claims that the policy underlying the portability of Australian pensions reflects international practice. Most contributory systems, particularly those operating in the member states of the European Union, have for many years encouraged portability of their benefits. They acknowledge that the individual's acquired right to benefits is derived from financial contributions and that the modern, global economy requires unhindered movement of people, finances and services. Portability of benefits as well as the possibility of accruing rights in one country and being paid in another country constitutes an important part of this new philosophy in the globalised world. Nevertheless, some countries still restrict portability of their social security payments to countries with which they have international social security agreements or reciprocal portability arrangements.
It’s not only Centrelink customers who stand to benefit from bilateral social security agreements, its also multinational employers. Amongst the countries that Australia has bilateral International Social Security agreements with is the USA. Social security payments hardly seems to be the sort of thing your typical off shore Aussie in the US is in need of.
So why is it in the interest of these two governments to enter into such a treaty? The US Social Security Administration site explains that theses agreements, often called "Totalisation agreements," have two main purposes. First, they eliminate dual Social Security taxation, the situation that occurs when a worker from one country works in another country and is required to pay Social Security taxes to both countries on the same earnings. Dual Social Security tax liability is a widespread problem for U.S. multinational companies and their employees. Secondly, the agreements help fill gaps in benefit protection for workers who have divided their careers between the United States and another country.
The aim of all U.S. totalisation agreements is to eliminate dual Social Security coverage and taxation while maintaining the coverage of as many workers as possible under the system of the country where they are likely to have the greatest attachment, both while working and after retirement.
You see these agreements are in the interest of big business too.
By the way Israel has social security agreements with Belgium, Holland, Germany and Finland and is at least negotiating totalisation agreements with the USA and Canada. That’s not necessarily an accurate up to date list.
Since its formation, the Southern Cross Group has been pushing for Australia to enter into more bilateral social security agreements with countries where none exist. In their Bilateral Agreements Overviewthey claim:
“If you are making contributions to a state pension scheme in a country with which Australia does not have a bilateral agreement, and with which Australia has not yet started negotiations for such an agreement, we strongly encourage you to
send an e-mail to the Australian Minister for Family and Community Services, pointing out this fact and urging the government to extend its network of agreements. It is only by making decision-makers in Canberra aware of the impact of the deficit in the current bilateral coverage that we can hope to see Australia enter into negotiations for further agreements. By working for more bilateral agreements today, we can help make sure that people retiring in ten, twenty or thirty years from now are not financially disadvantaged in the future.”
(*the Australian government’s Department of Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs)

Read More......

19 January 2007

Israel Trade Commission

Israel Trade Commission

Read More......